Patent Law | Expert Legal Commentary
May 20, 2008
Acumed II Addresses the Issue of Claim Preclusion and When a Patent Claim Could Have Been Brought
Acumed, LLC v. Stryker Corp., et al.
By
John R. Carr
In the recent case of Acumed, LLC v. Stryker Corp.,et al., (No. 2007-1115) (Fed. Cir., May 13, 2008) (“Acumed II”), the Federal Circuit addressed the meaning and application of language barring re-litigation of claims that “could have been brought” in a prior patent infringement case.
To continue reading this article, subscribe now
It's FREE and only takes seconds