Securities Law | Expert Legal Commentary
October 23, 2008
Free Enterprise Fund v. PCOAB: Sarbanes-Oxley’s PCAOB Is Not Unconstitutional
Enterprise Fund v. PCAOB
By
Joel B. Ginsberg
In its long-awaited opinion in Free Enterprise Fund v. PCAOB, 537 F.3d 667 (D.C. Cir. 2008), the Circuit Court for the D.C. Circuit upheld the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 – specifically that Act’s establishment of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) – against constitutional challenges. The plaintiffs argued that Act violates both the Appointments Clause of the Constitution as well as separation-of-powers principles by creating the PCAOB as a virtually independent, autonomous agency over which the President has minimal practical control and authority. The Court disagreed, finding that the Securities and Exchange Commission, over which the President has an appropriate amount of control, has sufficient legal authority over the PCAOB to support a finding that the Act is constitutional. But this case is far from over – appeals are expected, including to the U.S. Supreme Court, meaning that the future of Sarbanes-Oxley is still in question.
To continue reading this article, subscribe now
It's FREE and only takes seconds
1 See article published by the Competitive Enterprise Institute: http://cei.org/gencon/019,04988.cfm.
2 http://w4.stern.nyu.edu/accounting/docs/speaker_papers/spring2005/Zhang_Ivy_Economic_Consequences_of_S_O.pdf.
3 See, for example, an Editorial of The New York Sun, August 26, 2008, found at http://www.nysun.com/editorials/sell-sarbanes-oxley/84635/.
Image Credit: ©iStockphoto.com/PetrePlesea