More Copyright Law Updates
Page 3 of 9 of Copyright Law Summaries » New Judicial Opinions
Bradley Richlin, et al. v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Pictures, Inc., et al. | No. 06-55307 |
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 6/19/2008
Holding: The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled that Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Pictures, Inc., and not the heirs of the creator of Pink Panther, owns the copyright to the Pink Panther motion picture (“Motion Picture”). In affirming the decision of the District Court, the Ninth Circuit held that circumstances of…
More...
Meshwerks, Inc. v. Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., Inc., et al. | No. 06-4222 |
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit | 6/17/2008
Holding: In this advertising dispute, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit ruled that the digital wire-frame models of Toyota sedans used in a 2004 promotional campaign were not entitled to copyright protection for Meshwerks, Inc., the company that was hired to create them. Citing a basic rule that…
More...
Derek Andrew, Inc. v. Poof Apparel Corp. | No. 07-35048 |
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 6/11/2008
Holding: The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit resolved a novel issue: whether the Copyright Act, particularly 17 U.S.C. § 412, bars an award of statutory damages for post-registration infringements when the initial act of infringement occurred prior to the effective copyright registration date. Here, plaintiff-appellee, Derek Andrew, Inc.…
More...
Vernor v. Autodesk, Inc. | Case No. C07-1189RAJ |
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington at Seattle | 5/20/2008
Holding: The U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington held that the plaintiff second buyer of defendant Autodesk’s (“Autodesk”) copyrighted AutoCAD design software could legally auction such product on eBay, thus overruling Autodesk’s objection that its copyright prohibited resale. In particular, the District Court declared the transfer of the…
More...
Paul Oravec v. Sunny Isles Luxury Ventures, L.C., et al. | No. 06-14495 |
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 5/14/2008
Holding: The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit ruled that a twin high-rise condominium complex built by developer Donald Trump and others (“defendants-appellees”) did not infringe architect Paul Oravec’s (“plaintiff-appellant” or “Oravec”) copyrighted architectural designs. In affirming the District Court’s ruling, the Eleventh Circuit found differences between plaintiff-appellant’s designs…
More...
Litecubes, L.L.C. and Carl R. Vanderschuit v. Northern Lights Products, Inc. | 2006-1646 |
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit | 4/28/2008
Holding: A Federal Circuit upheld a district court’s denial of defendant GlowProducts’ motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction based on plaintiff Litecubes’ copyright and patent infringement action relating to defendant’s lighted artificial ice cube. According to the Federal Circuit, a plaintiff is able to establish subject matter jurisdiction…
More...
Silver Ring Splint Company v. Digisplint, Inc. | Civil No. 3:06cv00065, 2008 WL 1000775 |
District Court for the Western District of Virginia | 4/9/2008
Holding: On a motion for summary judgment involving four claims of infringement, a Virginia district court ruled that no reasonable jury could return a verdict that defendant Digisplint’s website selling finger splint products did not infringe plaintiff Silver Ring Splint’s copyright relating to its 1994 sales catalog also selling finger splint…
More...
The Nichols Agency, Inc. v. Enchanted Child Care, Inc. | Civil No. CCB-07-1757, 2008 WL 659507 |
D.Md. | 2/26/2008
Holding: The U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland dismissed a claim for breach of contract relating to plaintiff The Nichols Agency’s (“NAI”) copyrighted marketing works. According to the Court, NAI’s breach of contract claim that defendant Enchanted Child Care, Inc. (“ECCI”) displayed its commercials without permission was “substantively similar”…
More...
Shuptrine v. McDougal Litell, et al. | No. 1:07-CV-181, 2008 WL 400453 |
E.D.Tenn. | 2/12/2008
Holding: The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee denied defendant textbook publisher‘s motion to dismiss a fraud claim. Plaintiff copyright holder accused defendant of entering into a relationship allegedly under false pretenses designed to lower the cost of obtaining the copyrighted paintings. Even though this stated fraud could…
More...
The Romantics, et al. v. Activision Publishing, Inc., et al. | No. 07-14969, 2008 WL 186370 |
E.D.Mich. | 1/22/2008
Holding: The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, Southern Division, denied plaintiff rock band members’ application for a preliminary injunction that sought to restrain a video game’s use of a new recording of their song. According to the trial court, plaintiffs failed to establish the requisite of having…
More...
Page 3 of 9 of Copyright Law Summaries » New Judicial Opinions