Employment Law Updates

Featured Expert Legal Commentary

Lindsay v. APFA: Employees Have No Private Cause of Action under the RLA

By Jeremy J. Gray of Zuber & Taillieu LLP

The Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals has held that two provisions of the Railway Labor Act (“RLA”), 45 U.S.C. section 152, do not provide a private cause of action that would enable unhappy employees to overturn reworked agreements entered into by their union. In Lindsay v. Association of Professional… More...

More Employment Law Updates

Sort by:
Page 1 of 2 of Employment Law Commentaries
 1 2 >

Boucher v. Shaw: Imposing Personal Liability on Corporate Agents for FLSA Claims

Boucher v. Shaw  |  January 11, 2010

The Ninth Circuit U.S Court of Appeals has held that personal liability for unpaid wages and overtime compensation under Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) can be imposed upon individual corporate managers who exercise control over the employment relationship, even though the corporation has filed for More...

Brown v. J. Kaz Inc.: Independent Contractors Can Bring Section 1981 Claims

Brown v. J. Kaz Inc. d/b/a Craftmatic of Pittsburgh  |  December 18, 2009

In a case of first impression, the Third U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has agreed with three other federal appellate courts in finding that Section 1981 of the Civil Rights Act extends beyond employees to independent contractors.In Brown v. J. Kaz Inc. d/b/a Craftmatic of Pittsburgh, 581 F.3d 175 More...

Halpert v. Manhattan Apts: Employer May Be Liable for Contractor’s Discriminatory Acts

Halpert v. Manhattan Apartments Inc.  |  November 25, 2009

The Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals has held that under the federal Age Discrimination in Employment Act, employers may be held liable for discriminatory employment actions taken by their independent contractors. In Halpert v. Manhattan Apartments Inc., 580 F.3d 86 (2nd Cir. 2009), the Court More...

Van Asdale v. Int’l Game Tech.: In-house Counsel Can Bring SOX Whistleblower Claim

Van Asdale v. International Game Technology  |  November 9, 2009

The Ninth Circuit ruled that two in-house counsel could sue their former employer for wrongful termination under the Sarbanes-Oxley whistleblower provision, stating that the plaintiffs only needed to demonstrate that they reasonably believed fraud had occurred, not that fraud actually had occurred. More...

Hernandez v. Hillsides: Narrowing Workplace Privacy in California

Hernandez v. Hillsides  |  September 25, 2009

The California Supreme Court affirmed that employees have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the workplace, but held that in some circumstances, those rights may be limited, taking a backseat to an employer’s “legitimate business interests.” In Hernandez v. Hillsides, 47 Cal. 4th 272, 211 More...

Hughes v. Pair: High Standards for Sexual Harassment by Professionals

Hughes v. Pair  |  September 4, 2009

The California Supreme Court has held that a few vulgar and offensive but isolated comments made on a single day in the course of a professional relationship lasting several years did not constitute either actionable sexual harassment or intentional infliction of emotional distress. In Hughes v. More...

Ricci v. DeStefano: Firefighters Suffered Reverse Discrimination by City in Violation of Title VII

Ricci v. DeStefano  |  August 28, 2009

In a split decision that broke along conservative and liberal lines, the Supreme Court found that the city of New Haven engaged in reverse discrimination and violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 when it tossed out a qualification test that generated a sharp disparate impact in favor More...

Gross v. FBL Financial: Requiring “But-For” Causation in All Age Discrimination Cases

Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc.  |  August 4, 2009

In a 5-4 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court determined that the burden-shifting standard applicable to “mixed-motive” discrimination cases brought under Title VII specifically does not apply to age discrimination cases brought under the ADEA, pursuant to the plain statutory language of the ADEA. More...

AT&T v. Hulteen: No Gender-Based Discrimination in Pension Pay Plan That Excludes Pregnancy Leaves

AT&T v. Hulteen  |  July 27, 2009

A recent Supreme Court ruling has many practitioners – and perhaps Justice Ginsberg – anticipating the appointment of a woman to the Supreme Court to replace Justice Souter. While the ruling in AT&T v. Hulteen, ___ U.S. ___, 129 S.Ct. 1962 (2009), is relatively narrow in its specific More...

Webb v. City of Philadelphia: No Religious Discrimination If Accommodation Causes an Undue Burden

Webb v. City of Philadelphia  |  June 22, 2009

The Third Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals has upheld the Philadelphia Police Department’s dress code policy that forbids police officers from wearing any religious garb. When the city prohibited a female officer from wearing a Muslim head scarf with her uniform, she sued the city, alleging More...

Page 1 of 2 of Employment Law Commentaries
 1 2 >
Advertise with LawUpdates.com

Companies Mentioned

Employment Law

The following companies are mentioned in Employment Law Updates:

Ontario Police Department

City of Ontario

Arch Wireless Operating Company, Inc.

B & D Contracting

American Insurance Co.

Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

Watkins Motor Lines, Inc.

Agere Systems, Inc. f.k.a. Lucent Technologies, Inc.

Tulsa Winch, Inc.

Ramsey Winch, Inc.

Norris

DP Manufacturing, Inc.

ConocoPhillips

Auto Crane Company

AT&T Corp.

FBL Financial Group, Inc.

International Game Tchnology

Manhattan Apartments Inc.

J. Kaz, Inc.d.b.a. Craftmatic of Pittsburgh

Association of Professional Flight Attendants

AMR Corp.

American Airlines, Inc. a.k.a. American Eagle