Securities Law Summaries
Page 1 of 4 of Securities Law Summaries » New Statutes, Regulations and Rules 1 2 3 > Last »
New Rule Extending Mutual Fund Services to Investment Managers
Fund/SERV 12/08,
12/08/2008
The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation ("DTCC") has amendedits rules that will, for the first time, give investment managers who oversee managed accounts programs direct access to Fund/SERV and other mutual fund services. More...
Improved Disclosure for Mutual Fund Investors
PR 2008-275,
11/19/2008
The Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") has voted unanimously to improve mutual fund disclosure by requiring that funds provide investors with a concise summary - in plain English - of the key information they need to make informed investment decisions. The new summary prospectus will appear at the front of a fund's prospectus. More...
National Market System Plans for the Selection and Reservation of Securities Symbols
Release No. 34-57171; File No. 4-534, ,
11/06/2008
The Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") announced that it has approved a plan that establishes a process for reserving, selecting, and allocating securities symbols. The exchanges that list securities and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (FINRA) must join the plan within 60 days.
“Securities symbols are a… More...
Emergency Order Pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Taking Temporary Action to Respond to Market Developments
Release No. 34-58572,
09/17/2008
The Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") announced that it has taken several coordinated actions to strengthen investor protections against “naked” short selling. The SEC’s actions will apply to the securities of all public companies, including all companies in the financial sector. The agency action took effect at 12:01 a.m. ET… More...
Commission Guidance and Amendment to the Rules Relating to Organization and Program Management Concerning Proposed Rule Changes
Release No. 34-5809217, CFR Parts 200 and 241,
07/03/2008
The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) announced on July 3, 2008 that it has published on the same day a final rule and new interpretative guidance to improve the rulemaking process for exchanges and other self-regulatory organizations (SROs) that operate under SEC oversight.
The SEC also declared that… More...
Page 1 of 4 of Securities Law Summaries » New Statutes, Regulations and Rules 1 2 3 > Last »
Securities Law Commentaries
Following are Securities Law Commentaries elaborating on the significance of the most important of the Securities Law Summaries.
Page 1 of 4 of Securities Law Commentaries 1 2 3 > Last »
Guyden v. Aetna
Posted: 12/31/2008
Commentary: In Guyden v. Aetna, 544 F.3d 376 (2nd Cir. 2008) – a case of first impression in the federal circuit courts -- the Second Circuit confirmed that arbitration provisions are enforceable against an employee who claims that her termination violated the whistleblower protections of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. The opinion confirms the federal court’s strong support of arbitration provisions, and provides some guidance for employers seeking to implement arbitration agreements.
More...
Related summary: Whistleblower Claims Arbitrable under Sarbanes-Oxley Act, Second Circuit Says
In re: Salomon Analyst Metromedia Litigation
Posted: 12/12/2008
Commentary: In Douglas Millowitz v. Citigroup Global Markets et al (“In Re Salomon Analyst Metromedia Litigation”), 544 F.3d 474 (2nd Cir. 2008), the Second Circuit extended the fraud-on-the-market presumption of reliance, first set forth in Basic v. Levinson, 485 U.S. 224 (1988), to analyst reports. The Court also stated that defendants should be afforded the opportunity to rebut that presumption at the class certification stage in an effort to prevent certification. The opinion may make it harder to pursue class actions in some securities fraud cases.
More...
Related summary: Second Circuit Remands Metromedia Case, Rules that Liability Presumption Now Applies to Stock Analysts as Well
In re Merck & Co., Inc. Securities, Derivative & “ERISA” Litigation
Posted: 11/17/2008
Commentary: In In re Merck & Co., Inc. Securities, Derivative & “ERISA” Litig., ___ F.3d ___, 2008 WL 4138476 (3rd Cir. 2008), a federal circuit court revived a securities fraud class action suit against Merck that accuses the pharmaceutical company of hiding the truth about Vioxx and its link to cardiac problems. The district court had dismissed the class action as time barred, claiming that the plaintiffs were on inquiry notice more than two years before filing the suit. In a split decision on appeal, the Circuit Court disagreed, finding that reassuring messages from Merck and the market prevented plaintiffs from being on inquiry notice until much later.
More...
Related summary: Third Circuit Reinstates Vioxx Class Action Suit Against Merck
Enterprise Fund v. PCAOB
Posted: 10/23/2008
Commentary: In its long-awaited opinion in Free Enterprise Fund v. PCAOB, 537 F.3d 667 (D.C. Cir. 2008), the Circuit Court for the D.C. Circuit upheld the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 – specifically that Act’s establishment of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) – against constitutional challenges. The plaintiffs argued that Act violates both the Appointments Clause of the Constitution as well as separation-of-powers principles by creating the PCAOB as a virtually independent, autonomous agency over which the President has minimal practical control and authority. The Court disagreed, finding that the Securities and Exchange Commission, over which the President has an appropriate amount of control, has sufficient legal authority over the PCAOB to support a finding that the Act is constitutional. But this case is far from over – appeals are expected, including to the U.S. Supreme Court, meaning that the future of Sarbanes-Oxley is still in question.
More...
Related summary: DC Circuit Upholds Constitutionality of SEC Audit Panel
Teamsters Local 445 Freight Div. Pension Fund v. Dynex Capital Inc.
Posted: 09/19/2008
Commentary: In its highly anticipated opinion in Teamsters Local 445 Freight Div. Pension Fund v. Dynex Capital Inc., 531 F.3d 190 (2nd Cir. 2008), the Second Circuit affirmed that a securities fraud plaintiff can plead corporate scienter without specifically identifying the culpable corporate officer or director whose individual scienter could be imputed to the corporation. The plaintiff need only plead facts sufficient to establish a “strong inference” that someone in the corporation whose acts could be imputed to the corporation acted with the requisite scienter. However, the court warns that the standard for making such a pleading is very high, requiring heightened specificity.
More...
Related summary: Second Circuit: Securities Class Suit Failed to Plead Corporate Scienter Against Dynex and Merit
Page 1 of 4 of Securities Law Commentaries 1 2 3 > Last »