Trademark Law Updates | New Judicial Opinions

July 13, 2007

Bach v. Forever Living Products U.S., Inc.

C05-970MJP, 2007 WL 445447, W.D. Wash., 2/6/2007

Bach v. Forever Living Products U.S., Inc.


Because literary purchase agreement granting motion picture rights in the book "Jonathan Livingston Seagull" was a license rather than an assignment of trademark rights, plaintiff had standing to bring trademark infringement action. Material issues of fact remained on trade dress claim, likelihood of confusion and whether plaintiff abandoned the mark.

Detailed Summary:

Plaintiff, the author of the book “Jonathan Livingston Seagull,” brought both trademark and copyright infringement actions against defendant beauty product company. The court rejected defendant’s argument that the copyright claim precluded the trademark action since copyright law provides an adequate remedy, holding that the plaintiff sought to protect against different wrongs under different bodies of law. The court further held that the literary purchase agreement plaintiff executed limited the assigned rights only to motion picture and merchandising, while expressly reserving to the author all rights not granted. The author thus still owned the trademark rights. There was an issue of fact as to whether he had abandoned those rights by failing to maintain adequate quality control; defendant had not met its stringent burden of showing abandonment. Summary judgment was similarly inappropriate on the claims for trade dress infringement: regardless of whether plaintiff technically owned the trade dress, he had the right to royalties from others’ use of it and thus had standing to bring the trade dress claim. On the question of whether the trade dress had acquired secondary meaning, plaintiff had offered enough evidence of it to survive summary judgment. Finally, testimony from defendant’s distributors that they assumed defendant had permission to use the Jonathan name and likeness, which suggest endorsement or approval, was sufficient to defeat summary judgment on the likelihood of confusion claim.

Also See:

More Than $2.4 Million in Grants Released to 13 Jurisdictions to Combat Intellectual Property Theft

USPTO Seeks Comment on Possibility of Lowering Most Trademark Application Fees

USPTO Expands Trademark Law School Pilot Program

U.S. Customs and Border Protection Announces IPR Interim Final Rule

USPTO Issues TEAS 4.9 Release

The most advanced document                
         management system in the world.

Only $59 / person / month
FeaturesLawLoop Demo
FeaturesWelcome to the Future
Play LawLoop Demo

Companies Mentioned

Trademark Law

The following companies are mentioned in Trademark Law Updates:

Louis Vuitton Malletier S.A.

Tiffany (NJ) Inc.

Tiffany & Co.

eBay, Inc.

Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.

Rockstar Games, Inc. d.b.a. Play Pen

Volkswagen of America, Inc.

Shokan Coachworks, Inc.

Audi AG

University of Southern California

University of Oklahoma

Smack Apparel Company

Ohio State University

Louisiana State University

Collegiate Licensing Company

NTU Electronics, Inc.

Midway Services, Inc.

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board

MDCO, Inc.

Custom Manufacturing and Engineering, Inc.

Automated Engineering Corp.

Woofies, LLC d.b.a. Woofie’s Pet Boutique

Internet Specialties West, Inc.

International Trademark Association

Haute Diggity Dog, LLC

JA Apparel Corp.

Houndstooth Corp.

Harringbone Creative Services, Inc.

Mars, Inc.

Chute Gerdeman, Inc.

Nasalok Coating Corp.

Cuban Cigar Brands, N.V.

Nylok Corp.

Qualcomm Inc.

Future Lawn, Inc.

ESS Entertainment 2000, Inc.e.s.a. Rockstar Games, Inc.

Broadcom Corp.

Maumee Bay Landscape Contractors, LLC

Schussler Creative, Inc.

Axiom Worldwide, Inc.

Able Time, Inc.

North American Medical Corp.

Manheim Auctions, Inc.

Adagen Medical International, Inc.

Auction Management Solutions, Inc.

Utah Lighthouse Ministry

Pfizer Inc.

Discovery Computing, Inc.

Foundation for Apologetic Information & Research

Additional Resources

Trademark Law

Further Reading in Trademark Law

Other Recent Summaries

Recent Expert Legal Commentaries