Copyright Law Updates | New Judicial Opinions
October 14, 2008
CA Court Denies Injunctive Relief to Art Owner Victoria Ryan
Ryan v. Editions Ltd., Inc.
No. C 06-04812 PVT, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, 9/15/2008
Holding:
In this case, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California denied injunctive relief to Plaintiff Victoria Ryan, an owner of copyrighted original art works. Earlier, Plaintiff Ryan sold her art works through Defendant Editions Limited West, Inc. ("EWL"), a retailer. EWL cancelled the contract due to lack of sales of Ryan’s works. After cancellation, EWL encouraged other affiliated artists to produce and distribute copies of Ryan's original art works. Plaintiff then requested the issuance of injunction on her state claim of unfair competition and federal claim of copyright infringement. The District Court rejected such request, in the light of representations by EWL that it would no longer violate Ryan's copyright. The District Court however found that EWL did engage in unfair competition since it maintained a policy in favor of permitting transfers of owned work, without regard to whether the copyright owner authorized the copies, and promoted that policy by deceptive practices. Notwithstanding this finding of unfair competition, the federal claim of copyright infringement preempted such state claim. The District Court reasoned that the rights sought to be enforced under state laws are equivalent to those protected under the Copyright Act, and that Ryan's art work fell within the subject matter of the same Act.
Detailed Summary:
By way of background, Plaintiff Ryan sold art through EWL, a retailer. EWL cancelled the contract due lack of sales of Ryan’s works. After cancellation, EWL encouraged other affiliated artists to produce and distribute copies of Ryan’s original art works. In this case, the District Court granted partial summary judgment in favor of defendant EWL on the following claims: (1) breach of contract; and (2) slander of title. In addition, the District Court found only one instance of copyright infringement and the damages for copyright infringement, if proven, were limited to $1.72.
Defendant EWL then moved for partial summary judgment on…
To continue reading this article, subscribe now
It's FREE and only takes seconds