Patent Law Updates | New Judicial Opinions

August 25, 2008

Federal Circuit Reverses Microsoft's $8M Award and Patent Invalidity Judgment

Research Corp. Technologies Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.
No. 2006-1275, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit , 8/1/2008

Holding:

In this dispute over patents relating to image halftoning technology, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed the district court's finding of inequitable conduct against patentee Research Corporation Technologies ("RCT"), and reversed the award of $8 million in attorney's fees in favor of Microsoft Corp. ("Microsoft"). The district court found inequitable conduct because the inventors did not disclose their post-filing K factor tests to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office ("USPTO"). On appeal, the Federal Circuit held otherwise, stating that because the inventor’s work occurred after the filing of the patent application, these K factor experiments were not material to their inventive activity. In the circumstances of this case, therefore, the inventors had no obligation to report their later tests to the USPTO. Importantly, the inventor and her coauthors published the K factor tests to the scientific community. Publication is an act inconsistent with an intent to conceal data from the USPTO. In addition to the district court's error in its analysis of the materiality prong, the Federal Circuit also found the district court erred in its intent analysis. Because the Federal Circuit vacated the district court's determination of unenforceability due to inequitable conduct, it also vacated the exceptionality finding and the grant of attorney fees in favor of Microsoft.

Detailed Summary:

In this case, the United States District Court for the District of Arizona held plaintiff-appellant RCT’s patents unenforceable due to inequitable conduct. The district court also granted defendant-appellee Microsoft Corp. summary judgment of invalidity and noninfringement.

All the patents at issue relate to image halftoning technology used in computers and printers. A halftone is an image which simulates a continuous tone image, but is actually an arrangement of individual dots. The particular spacing between the dots gives the viewer the illusion of a continuous picture consisting of varying shades of gray in a halftone image. Opinion, p. 3.

RCT filed…

E-mail Email this Article
Print Printable Version (in new window)
View a PDF of the judicial opinion

Companies Mentioned

Microsoft Corp.

Research Corp. Technologies Inc.

More Updates

Patent Law Updates

Companies Mentioned

Patent Law

The following companies are mentioned in Patent Law Updates:

Boston Scientific Corp.

Microsoft Corp.

Stryker Corp.

Samsung Electronics America, Inc.

Cordis Corp.

Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc.

U.S. Patent and Trademark Office

Stryker Sales Corp.

Stryker Orthopaedics

Howmedica Osteonics Corp.

Acumed, LLC

Quanta Computer, Inc.

Sanyo North America Corp.

LG Electronics, Inc.

Smith & Nephew, Inc.

Cohesive Technologies, Inc.

Waters Corp.

Swisa, Inc.

Egyptian Goddess, Inc.

Motorola, Inc.

Dror Swisa

Johnson & Johnson, Inc.

Target Corp.

Sears Holding Corp.

Kohl’s Department Stores, Inc.

K-Mart Corp.

J.C. Penney Company, Inc.

Audiovox Communications Corp.

Glamourmom LLC

McKesson Information Solutions, Inc.

Federated Department Stores

Bridge Medical, Inc.

Elizabeth Lange LLC d.b.a. Liz Lange Maternity

United States Patent and Trademark Office

SmithKline Beecham PLC

Smithkline Beecham Corp. (d.b.a. GlaxoSmithKline, plc.)

SmithKline Beecham Corp. d.b.a GlaxoSmithKline

Scimed Life Systems Inc.

HT Window Fashion Corp.

Glaxo Group Limited d.b.a. GlaxoSmithKline

Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical, Inc.

Ranbaxy, Inc.

Mylan Pharmaceutical, Inc.

Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.

Mylan Laboratories, Inc.

Nokia, Inc.

Abbott Laboratories

Therasense, Inc.

Toshiba Corp.

Osteotech, Inc.

Additional Resources

Patent Law