Securities Law Updates | New Statutes, Regulations and Rules

June 28, 2012

Financial Stability Board Publishes Third Progress Report on Implementation of OTC Derivatives Market Reforms

FSB’s Third Progress Report on Implementation of OTC Derivatives Market Reforms
Ref No 36/2012, 6/15/2012

Financial Stability Board Publishes Third Progress Report on Implementation of OTC Derivatives Market Reforms

The Financial Stability Board (FSB) has published its third six-monthly progress report on the implementation of over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives market reforms.

The report reviews progress made by international standard-setting bodies, national and regional authorities and market participants towards meeting the commitments made by G20 Leaders at the Pittsburgh 2009 Summit that, by end-2012, all standardized OTC derivative contracts be traded on exchanges or electronic trading platforms, where appropriate, and cleared through central counterparties (CCPs); that OTC derivative contracts be reported to trade repositories; and that non-centrally cleared contracts be subject to higher capital requirements.

The report notes that, since the previous FSB progress report in October 2011, encouraging progress has been made in setting international standards, the advancement of national legislation and regulation by a number of jurisdictions; and practical implementation of reforms to market infrastructures and activities. But much remains to be completed by the end-2012 deadline.

Broadly speaking, the jurisdictions with the largest markets in OTC derivatives - the EU, Japan and the US - are the most advanced in structuring their legislative and regulatory frameworks. They expect to have regulatory frameworks in place by end-2012 and practical implementation within their markets is well underway. Other jurisdictions are generally less advanced, although progress has been made by many of them, particularly with respect to central clearing and reporting to trade repositories.

One reason for the slower timetables in some jurisdictions has been that authorities had been waiting for the key elements of the regulatory frameworks in the EU, Japan and the US to be finalized before putting their own legislation in place. Some jurisdictions have also sought greater certainty about the application of international principles and safeguards to cross-border financial market infrastructure, so as to make an informed decision about the appropriate form of market infrastructure for their jurisdiction to meet the G20 commitments.

Since the October 2011 progress report, standard setting bodies have made significant progress in developing the international policies that are key to advancing OTC derivatives reform implementation across jurisdictions, notably:

 CPSS and IOSCO issued in April 2012 Principles for Financial Market Infrastructures (PFMIs), which are an important milestone in the global development of a sound basis for central clearing of all standardized OTC derivatives.

 IOSCO published in February 2012 recommendations on requirements for mandatory central clearing.

 CPSS and IOSCO in January 2012 outlined OTC derivatives data reporting and aggregation requirements, recommending that trade repositories implement measures to provide authorities with effective and practical access.

 IOSCO in June 2012 published standards for the regulation of OTC derivatives market intermediaries.

In January 2012, the FSB responded to the request from some jurisdictions for guidance to help them make informed decisions about the form of CCPs to use in order to meet the G20 commitment on central clearing by identifying four safeguards for a resilient and efficient global framework for central clearing. Substantial progress has now been made, through international work streams and otherwise, to provide these safeguards and thus allow authorities to make their decisions.

With international standard setting and policy guidance now largely complete, jurisdictions need to promptly develop and implement legislative and regulatory frameworks. These frameworks should be comprehensive, consistent, and also flexible enough to facilitate continued cooperation on issues as they arise because not all potential issues can be identified and solved in advance of legislative and regulatory implementation.

Full and consistent implementation by all FSB members is important to reduce systemic risk and the risk of regulatory arbitrage that could arise if there are significant gaps in implementation.

But legislation and regulation are not by themselves enough. Market participants need to take practical steps to ensure that the necessary market infrastructure is available by further expanding the number and scope of OTC derivatives transactions that are standardized, centrally cleared, traded on organized platforms and reported to trade repositories. Under the guidance of the OTC Derivatives Supervisors Group, market participants made some strides towards increased central clearing and trade reporting even before agreement on the G20 commitments.

Nevertheless, further progress is still needed both by the largest dealers and by other market participants.

This report concludes that good progress has been made from an international policy perspective and from a practical perspective in those jurisdictions with the largest OTC derivatives markets. However all jurisdictions and markets need to push aggressively ahead to achieve full implementation of market changes by end-2012 to meet the G20 commitments in as many reform areas as possible.

Jurisdictions have sufficient information about international standards and policies to put in place the needed legislation and regulation.They should do so promptly. Given the importance of practical implementation, the FSB will focus increasingly on monitoring not only the legislative and regulatory steps that have been achieved but also the concrete implementation that has taken place. In the next progress report, to be published before the November G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors meeting, the FSB intends to put additional focus on the readiness of infrastructures to provide central clearing, platform trading and reporting of OTC derivatives, the practical ability of industry to meet the requirements, and the remaining steps for industry to take.

In October 2010 the FSB published 21 recommendations for implementing the G20 commitments. The first FSB progress report on implementation was published in April 2011, and the second FSB progress report in October 2011.

The FSB has been established to coordinate at the international level the work of national financial authorities and international standard setting bodies and to develop and promote the implementation of effective regulatory, supervisory and other financial sector policies in the interest of financial stability. It brings together national authorities responsible for financial stability in 24 countries and jurisdictions, international financial institutions, sector-specific international groupings of regulators and supervisors, and committees of central bank experts.

The FSB is chaired by Mark Carney, Governor of the Bank of Canada. Its Secretariat is located in Basel, Switzerland, and hosted by the Bank for International Settlements.

View a PDF of the rule

Also See:

House Committee Passes Bill Fast-Tracking Exemptions to Securities Registrations to Small Businesses

Traders Charged in Massive Kickback Scheme Involving Venezuelan Official

SEC Charges Gatekeepers of Two Mutual Fund Trusts for Inaccurate Disclosures about Decisions on Behalf of Shareholders

SEC Seeks to Halt Scheme Raising Investor Funds Under Guise of JOBS Act

Investors to Receive Their Entire Investments Back after SEC Halted Scheme Exploiting Immigration Program

The most advanced document                
         management system in the world.

Only $59 / person / month
FeaturesLawLoop Demo
FeaturesWelcome to the Future
Play LawLoop Demo

Companies Mentioned

Securities Law

The following companies are mentioned in Securities Law Updates:

Securities and Exchange Commission

Harris Associates, L.P.

Banc of America Securities LLC

Citicorp USA, Inc.

Jan Charles Finance S.A.

Park East, Inc.

CIBC World Markets Corp.

Citigroup Inc.

Barclays Capital Inc.

Citigroup Global Markets, Inc.

The Public Employees’ Retirement System of Mississippi

Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc.

Toronto Dominion Texas, LLC f.k.a. Toronto Dominion Texas, Inc.

Alex Brown, Inc.

Tellabs, Inc.

Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc.

Mizuho International PLC

SG Cowen Securities Corp.

Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.

ABN AMRO Inc.

Lydia Capital, LLC

Suntrust Capital Markets, Inc.

Tribune Company

Fleet Securities, Inc. n.k.a. Bank of America, N.A.

City of Philadelphia Board of Pensions and Retirement

The Bank of New York Company, Inc.

Staples, Inc.

CIBC, Inc.

Citibank, N.A.

Metal Management, Inc.

European Metal Recycling, Ltd.

Salomon Smith Barney Inc. n.k.a. Citigroup Global Markets, Inc.

Calyon Securities (USA), Inc. f.k.a. Credit Lyonnais Securities (USA) Inc.

Salomon Smith Barney, Inc.

Calyon New York Branch (successor by operation of law to Credit Lyonnais New York Branch)

Dynex Capital Inc.

Citigroup, Inc.

JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Merit Securities Corp.

JPMorgan Securities Inc.

Teamsters Local 445 Freight Division Pension Fund

Aetna, Inc.

Scotia Capital (USA), Inc.,

Cowen & Co., LLC f.k.a. SG Cowen Securities Corp.

Societe Generale

SunTrust Bank

TD Securities (USA), Inc.

BMO Nesbitt Burns Corp. n.k.a. Harris Nesbitt Burns Corp.

Consolidated Leasing Hugoton Joint Venture #2

Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney Professional Corporation

Additional Resources

Securities Law

Further Reading in Securities Law

Other Recent Summaries

Recent Expert Legal Commentaries