Employment Law Updates | New Settlements and Verdicts

February 16, 2009

LA Weight Loss Settles Nationwide Sex Discrimination Suit for $20M

EEOC v. LA Weight Loss, Inc.
No. WDQ-02-CV-648, U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland, 12/1/2008

LA Weight Loss Settles Nationwide Sex Discrimination Suit for $20M

Holding:

LA Weight Loss Centers, Inc., ("LA Weight Loss," renamed Pure Weight Loss, Inc., in early 2007) has settled a nationwide sex discrimination suit for $20 million. In particular, LA Weight Loss agreed to pay $16,842,656 in back pay and $3,157,344 in punitive damages to men whom plaintiff the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC") determined were subjected to hiring discrimination because of their gender during the period January 1, 1997, through the entry of the consent decree. Additionally, the consent decree required hiring of rejected male applicants and included numerical benchmarks for hiring and/or promoting men to the positions from which they had been previously excluded; required LA Weight Loss to conduct quarterly reviews to assess attainment of its hiring goals; and, at EEOC’s option, required LA Weight Loss to employ an outside expert to examine the hiring process to assist in achieving any unmet hiring goals.

Detailed Summary:

According to EEOC’s suit, LA Weight Loss had a nationwide policy of not hiring qualified males into the positions of counselor/sales, medical assistants, assistant managers, center managers, area supervisors, trainers, and other field positions. Former Area Trainer Kathy Koch was disciplined and fired in retaliation for complaining about the company’s policy of not hiring men and for interviewing male candidates, EEOC also alleged.

LA Weight Loss discontinued its business operations in January 2008 and filed a voluntary petition under Chapter 7 of the United States Bankruptcy Code on January 11, 2008, in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (Case No. 08-10315-JKF). The bankruptcy trustee has agreed to the terms of the consent decree, which was approved by the bankruptcy court.

According to the EEOC, refusing to hire qualified applicants because of their gender, maintaining sex-specific job classifications, and retaliating against employees who protest unlawful discriminatory practices violate Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

Pursuant to the consent decree and as approved by the bankruptcy trustee, EEOC will have a claim in bankruptcy court of $20 million—$16,842,656 in back pay and $3,157,344 in punitive damages—payable to men whom the EEOC determined were subjected to hiring discrimination because of their sex during the period January 1, 1997, through the entry of the decree. The portion of the settlement, if any, that EEOC will be able to obtain through its pending bankruptcy court claim is presently unknown. Ms. Koch settled with LA Weight Loss in November, 2005.

Along with the monetary relief to the class members, the ten-year consent decree provides for significant injunctive relief. The decree applies to all Pure Weight Loss centers or to any successor resuming business operations. The decree:

—prohibits Pure Weight Loss from discriminating against job applicants or employees because of sex and retaliating against any of its employees or applicants;
—requires Pure Weight Loss to use an electronic applicant tracking system for each person hired and for any person who submits an application, and to provide specific information on applicants by sex and other categories defined by EEOC; and
— mandates that Pure Weight Loss create a discrimination complaint procedure, post its commitment to equal opportunity and a diverse workforce, and report compliance to the EEOC.

View a PDF of the settlement

Companies Mentioned

LA Weight Loss, Inc. n.k.a. Pure Weight Loss, Inc.

Also See:

EEOC Updates Guidance on Employer Use of Arrest and Conviction Records

Jobs Bill for New Veterans Would Enlist Local Business Leaders as Mentors

Domestic Partnership Benefits and Obligations Act Clears Senate Committee

Justice Department Will Not Challenge Worker Rights Consortium's Designated Suppliers Program for Collegiate Apparel

US Labor Department Publishes Revised List of Products Made with Forced or Indentured Child Labor

Companies Mentioned

Employment Law

The following companies are mentioned in Employment Law Updates:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

Ontario Police Department

City of Ontario

Arch Wireless Operating Company, Inc.

Ramsey Winch, Inc.

Norris

DP Manufacturing, Inc.

Auto Crane Company

Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School

B & D Contracting

Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee

Watkins Motor Lines, Inc.

Agere Systems, Inc. f.k.a. Lucent Technologies, Inc.

Tulsa Winch, Inc.

EGL, Inc.

Eagle Freight Systems, Inc.

Industrial Division of the Communications Workers of America

Visteon Corp.

ConocoPhillips

Google, Inc.

U.S. Airways, Inc.

AT&T Corp.

Rosen Louik & Perry, P.C.

FBL Financial Group, Inc.

Granite Rock Company

International Game Tchnology

International Brotherhood of Teamsters

Manhattan Apartments Inc.

International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Freight Construction, General Drivers, Warehousemen & Helpers, Local 287 (AFL-CIO)

J. Kaz, Inc.d.b.a. Craftmatic of Pittsburgh

State Lottery Commission of Indiana d.b.a. The Hoosier Lottery

Association of Professional Flight Attendants

Kellogg Brown & Root technical Services, Inc.

AMR Corp.

Service Employees International, Inc.

American Airlines, Inc. a.k.a. American Eagle

Zurich American Insurance Co.

Highgate LTC Management, LLC

Autozone, Inc.

Southwestern Bell Video Services, Inc.

Temco Service Industries, Inc.

SBC Telecom, Inc.

14 Penn Plaza LLC

SBC Services, Inc.

City of Philadelphia

Pacific Telesis Group

Northeastern Land Services, Ltd. d.b.a. NLS Group

Pacific Bell Telephone Co.

LA Weight Loss, Inc. n.k.a. Pure Weight Loss, Inc.

Pacific Bell Information Services

Further Reading in Employment Law

Other Recent Summaries

Recent Expert Legal Commentaries