Trademark Law Updates | New Judicial Opinions

June 16, 2008

NY District Court: Well-known Designer Can’t Use His Own Personal Name for His New Line of Clothing

JA Apparel Corp. v. Joseph Abboud, et al.
No. 07-Civ. 7787 (THK), U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, 6/5/2008

Holding:

In this infringement suit involving the “Joseph Abboud” mark, a district court permanently enjoined fashion designer Joseph Abboud from using his own name to sell, market, or even promote his new menswear clothing line called “jaz.” Specifically, the district court found that Abboud did in fact sell, convey and transfer to plaintiff JA Apparel all of his right and interest to the use of his personal name, in addition to the trademarks, trade names, and designations containing his name, for commercial purposes. On this basis, the district court found Abboud’s proposed use, in connection with his new “jaz” clothing line, would constitute a breach of a prior agreement, irrespective of whether his planned use constituted trademark use. Even in the context of good faith analysis under the “fair use” doctrine, Abboud had attempted to use that which he expressly sold to plaintiff. Consumers seeing JA Apparel’s products marked or advertised as “Joseph Abboud” or “by Joseph Abboud,” would be utterly confused as to whether the “jaz” products advertised as “by designer Joseph Abboud,” were derived from the same source. Abboud was not however restricted from identifying himself when he personally presents his line to buyers within the industry or to potential licensees, or in making personal appearances that do not relate to the sale, marketing, or promotion of goods, products, or services.

Detailed Summary:

Defendant Joseph Abboud (“Abboud”) is a fashion designer.  In 1987, Abboud launched his first menswear line under the “Joseph Abboud” label, while working for the Milton Freeberg Company.  It was at this time that Abboud also registered his personal name, “Joseph Abboud,” as a trademark with the U.S. Patent and Trademark office (“USPTO”).  Thereafter, in March 1988, Abboud, through his wholly-owned corporation, Houndstooth Corp., entered into a joint venture with GFT International B.V. (“GFT”) to manufacture, market, and sell various products under the Joseph Abboud brand name.  The joint venture was named JA Apparel, which is the plaintiff in this case. …

E-mail Email this Article
Print Printable Version (in new window)
View a PDF of the judicial opinion

Companies Mentioned

Harringbone Creative Services, Inc.

Houndstooth Corp.

JA Apparel Corp.

More Updates

Trademark Law Updates

Companies Mentioned

Trademark Law

The following companies are mentioned in Trademark Law Updates:

Tiffany (NJ) Inc.

Tiffany & Co.

eBay, Inc.

Haute Diggity Dog, LLC

JA Apparel Corp.

Houndstooth Corp.

Harringbone Creative Services, Inc.

Mars, Inc.

Chute Gerdeman, Inc.

Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.

Rockstar Games, Inc. d.b.a. Play Pen

Volkswagen of America, Inc.

Shokan Coachworks, Inc.

Audi AG

University of Southern California

University of Oklahoma

Smack Apparel Company

Ohio State University

Louisiana State University

Collegiate Licensing Company

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board

NTU Electronics, Inc.

Midway Services, Inc.

Internet Specialties West, Inc.

MDCO, Inc.

Custom Manufacturing and Engineering, Inc.

Automated Engineering Corp.

Woofies, LLC d.b.a. Woofie’s Pet Boutique

Louis Vuitton Malletier S.A.

International Trademark Association

Manley Toys, Ltd.

McGills Glass Warehouse

WMS Gaming, Inc.

AW Computer Holdings LLC

WPC Productions Ltd.

Wolfe’s Borough Coffee, Inc. d.b.a. Black Bear Micro Roastery

PartyGaming PLC

Starbucks U.S. Brands, LLC

Talisker Corp.

Starbucks Corp.

Talisker Deer Valley Corp.

The Crash Dummy Movie, LLC

Prime West Jordanelle, LLC

Mattel, Inc.

Prime West Jordanelle II, LLC

Monster Cable Products, Inc.

Tabacalera Popular Cubana, Inc.

Audiovox Corp.

Max Rohr, Inc.

Nasalok Coating Corp.

Additional Resources

Trademark Law