Securities Law Updates | New Judicial Opinions
June 21, 2007
Second Circuit Affirms in Part and Vacates in Part District Court's Ruling in Roth v. Jennings
Roth v. Jennings
06-0784-CV, 2007 WL 1629889, C.A.2 (N.Y.), 6/6/2007
Holding:
An agreement to act together for the purpose of acquiring, holding, or disposing of shares need not be unconditional in order to support a finding that the actors constituted a group within the meaning of federal securities laws; additionally, formation of such a group may be formal or informal and may be proved by direct or circumstantial evidence.
Detailed Summary:
This case is an appeal from the dismissal of a derivative suit filed on behalf of issuer (nominal defendant MMI). Plaintiff sought disgorgement to issuer of “short-swing profits” made by issuer’s former chairman (defendant Jennings) and a private company (defendant EMR), which held 14.8% of issuer’s stock. The district court granted both defendants’ motions to dismiss on the ground that the complaint was insufficient to plead that defendants acted as a group, given the disclaimers of group status made in the documents they filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).
The district court justified its dismissal of the suit…
To continue reading this article, subscribe now
It's FREE and only takes seconds