Home » Securities Law Updates » New Statutes, Regulations and Rules » Current Summary

Securities Law Summary

SEC Issues New Final Rule and Interpretive Guidance to Improve Rule-Making Process for Exchanges and SROs

Commission Guidance and Amendment to the Rules Relating to Organization and Program Management Concerning Proposed Rule Changes
Release No. 34-5809217, CFR Parts 200 and 241, 07/03/2008

Basic Information

The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) announced on July 3, 2008 that it has published on the same day a final rule and new interpretative guidance to improve the rulemaking process for exchanges and other self-regulatory organizations (SROs) that operate under SEC oversight.

The SEC also declared that this new issuance is intended to help increase the competitiveness of U.S. markets, the speed with which new products and services can be made available to investors, and the effectiveness of measures designed to protect investors.

The SEC anticipated that the guidance will result in exchanges filing a broader range of proposed changes to trading rules for immediate effectiveness under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) of the Exchange Act. Additionally, the SEC provided guidance on proposed rule changes relating to an SRO’s minor rule violation plan (“MRVP”) and “copycat” filings relating to SRO rules other than trading rules. The guidance provided as it related to proposed changes to trading rules is directed at SROs that operate trading systems (i.e., the national securities exchanges). The additional guidance is applicable to all SROs, including exchanges, national securities associations, clearing agencies, and the MSRB.

The new issuance included the adoption of an amendment to Rule 200.30-3(a)(12) of the Exchange Act relating to the delegation of authority to the Director of the Division of Trading and Markets regarding the publication of proposed rule changes. Specifically, the amended rule specifies that the Division shall issue notices of all proposed rule changes within 15 business days of filing thereof by the self-regulatory organization unless the Director of the Division personally directs otherwise, and, if the Director has so directed, he shall promptly notify the Commission and either the Commission or the Director may order publication of the notice thereafter.

In making such issuance, the SEC had observed that over the past decade, major securities markets have transformed themselves from member-owned quasi-utilities into shareholder-owned, for-profit, multi-national businesses, and technology has revolutionized securities trading. Trades are now measured in milliseconds, and competitive decision making in the marketplace is urgent and immediate. This era of high-tech, global, and competitive exchanges has put an even greater premium on the SEC reviewing the rule proposals of SROs in a timely manner.

“Exchanges are competing with one another to provide more products to more investors more efficiently than ever before,” said SEC Chairman Christopher Cox. “But exchanges today also need to be able to change their rules quickly to respond to investors’ needs in this competitive environment. These changes in the SEC’s internal procedures should help strengthen the protection of investors who reap the benefits of healthier and more competitive markets.”

Under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, when a proposed rule change is submitted by an SRO for Commission review, the Commission is required to approve it or institute proceedings to disapprove it within 35 days of its publication. This 35-day deadline can be extended for up to 90 days in certain cases.

To address concerns from market participants and others about rule-processing delays, the SEC has proposed to amend its internal rules of procedure to require that any proposed rule change filed by an SRO for review be published within 15 business days. In the rare instance when a rule change is unusually complex or raised novel issues, the Director of the Division of Trading and Markets would be able to make exceptions to this 15-day requirement.

The new interpretive guidance seeks to elaborate on the SEC’s views regarding proposed rule changes that may properly be filed for immediate effectiveness, and specifically, those proposed rule changes filed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 19b-4(f)(6), under which “non-controversial” rule changes may be filed.

The guidance would address the proposed changes to rules governing exchange trading systems that could be filed for immediate effectiveness. If these changes implicated any policy issues, they would have to be addressed consistently with how the Commission has dealt with them in the past. The guidance provides many helpful examples in this regard.

The guidance and rules will be effective upon their publication in the Federal Register.

View a PDF of the rule.

Service

Link Link to this article · E-mail Send via E-mail · Print Printable Version (opens in new window)


Email Subscribe to Email Updates
RSS Subscribe to RSS Feeds

Search this Site

Advanced Search

Sponsored Ads


Discussion Forums

Securities Law

Enter our NEW discussion forums to interact with other readers about Securities Law.

Companies Mentioned

Securities Law

The following companies are mentioned in Securities Law Updates:

Harris Associates, L.P.

California Department of Corporations

The Public Employees’ Retirement System of Mississippi

Consolidated Management Group, LLC

Asset Management Holding AG

Jan Charles Finance S.A.

Tellabs, Inc.

Park East, Inc.

Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.

Tribune Company

City of Philadelphia Board of Pensions and Retirement

Metal Management, Inc.

European Metal Recycling, Ltd.

Dynex Capital Inc.

Merit Securities Corp.

Teamsters Local 445 Freight Division Pension Fund

Consolidated Leasing Hugoton Joint Venture #2

Consolidated Leasing Anadarko Joint Venture

Guardian Capital Management

Vesta Insurance Group, Inc.

Free Enterprise Fund

Torchmark Corp.

Beckstead and Watts, LLP

KPMG Peat Marwick, LLP

Public Company Accounting Oversight Board

Florida State Board of Administration

The Cleaners & Caulkers Local 1 Pension Fund

Countrywide Securities Corp.

Churchmen’s Investment Corp.

Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc.

Churchmen’s Capital Group, Inc.

Bear Stearns Securities Corp.

UBS Securities LLC

Alanar, Inc.

Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc.

Guardian Services, LLC

Citigroup Global Market Inc.

Watermark M-One Holdings, Inc.

Lydia Capital, LLC

Lehman Brothers, Inc.

M-One Financial Services, LLC

Apple Computer, Inc.

Greenwich Capital Markets, Inc.

Watermark Capital Group, LLC

Lancer Management Group, LLC

Perseus, LLC

Edward D. Jones & Co., L.P.

Alcatel USA, Inc.

Lancer Management Group II, LLC

Lancer Offshore, Inc.

Additional Resources

Securities Law

Securities Act of 1933 (pdf, 241kb)

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (pdf, 927kb)

Trust Indenture Act of 1939 (pdf, 154kb)

Investment Company Act of 1940 (pdf, 400kb)

Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (pdf, 131kb)

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (pdf, 195kb)

Need a Lawyer?

The lawyers at Zuber & Taillieu LLP have top credentials, and offer exceptional services in all areas of law found on LawUpdates.com.

Visit Zuber & Taillieu LLP