Employment Law Updates | New Statutes, Regulations, and Rules

January 13, 2011

US Labor Department Proposes Rule to Enhance Target Date Retirement Fund Disclosures

Target Date Retirement Fund Disclosures
No. 10-1658-NAT, 11/29/2010

US Labor Department Proposes Rule to Enhance Target Date Retirement Fund Disclosures

The U.S. Department of Labor’s Employee Benefits Security Administration has issued a proposed rule that will help America’s workers better understand target date retirement funds and other similar investments offered in 401(k)-type pension plans.

The proposed rule would amend the “qualified default investment alternative regulation” and the “participant-level disclosure regulation” to enhance and provide more specificity regarding the information that must be disclosed to participants and beneficiaries concerning investments in target date funds.

“Based on our collaborative examination of this issue with the Securities and Exchange Commission, it is clear that all participants in participant-directed individual account plans can benefit from better information about how target date investments are designed to meet their retirement savings needs,” said Assistant Secretary of Labor for EBSA Phyllis C. Borzi.

Background

EBSA is responsible for administering and enforcing the fiduciary, reporting, and disclosure provisions of Title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). The agency oversees approximately 708,000 private pension plans, including 483,000 participant-directed individual account plans such as 401(k)-type plans.

A “participant-directed plan” is a plan that provides for the allocation of investment responsibilities to participants or beneficiaries. An estimated 72 million participants are covered by these participant-directed plans, which contain nearly $3 trillion in assets. Many of these plans include TDFs.

TDFs are designed to make it more convenient for individuals saving for retirement - they allocate investments among different asset classes, and change that allocation to become more conservative over time.

However, TDFs are not managed according to uniform strategies. TDFs with the same target date can have very different investment strategies and asset allocations. Participants and investors may not understand these differences, which can lead to very different levels of risk and investment results over time.

In June 2009, EBSA and the Securities and Exchange Commission held a joint public hearing to explore issues related to TDFs, including how they are managed at the investment level, how they are selected by plan fiduciaries and by investors, and how information about them is disclosed to plan participants and investors.

The proposed amendments require new disclosures about the design and operation of target date or similar investments, including an explanation of:

- The investment’s asset allocation.

- How that allocation will change over time, with a graphic illustration.

- The significance of the investment’s “target” date.

The proposed amendments also require a statement concerning the risk that a participant investing in a TDF may lose money in that investment, even close to retirement.

Also See:

EEOC Updates Guidance on Employer Use of Arrest and Conviction Records

Jobs Bill for New Veterans Would Enlist Local Business Leaders as Mentors

Domestic Partnership Benefits and Obligations Act Clears Senate Committee

Justice Department Will Not Challenge Worker Rights Consortium's Designated Suppliers Program for Collegiate Apparel

US Labor Department Publishes Revised List of Products Made with Forced or Indentured Child Labor

Companies Mentioned

Employment Law

The following companies are mentioned in Employment Law Updates:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

Ontario Police Department

City of Ontario

Arch Wireless Operating Company, Inc.

DP Manufacturing, Inc.

Auto Crane Company

Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School

B & D Contracting

Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee

Watkins Motor Lines, Inc.

Agere Systems, Inc. f.k.a. Lucent Technologies, Inc.

Tulsa Winch, Inc.

Ramsey Winch, Inc.

Norris

Industrial Division of the Communications Workers of America

Visteon Corp.

ConocoPhillips

Google, Inc.

U.S. Airways, Inc.

AT&T Corp.

Rosen Louik & Perry, P.C.

FBL Financial Group, Inc.

Granite Rock Company

International Game Tchnology

International Brotherhood of Teamsters

Manhattan Apartments Inc.

International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Freight Construction, General Drivers, Warehousemen & Helpers, Local 287 (AFL-CIO)

J. Kaz, Inc.d.b.a. Craftmatic of Pittsburgh

State Lottery Commission of Indiana d.b.a. The Hoosier Lottery

Association of Professional Flight Attendants

Kellogg Brown & Root technical Services, Inc.

AMR Corp.

Service Employees International, Inc.

American Airlines, Inc. a.k.a. American Eagle

Zurich American Insurance Co.

Highgate LTC Management, LLC

Autozone, Inc.

Southwestern Bell Video Services, Inc.

Temco Service Industries, Inc.

SBC Telecom, Inc.

14 Penn Plaza LLC

SBC Services, Inc.

City of Philadelphia

Pacific Telesis Group

Northeastern Land Services, Ltd. d.b.a. NLS Group

Pacific Bell Telephone Co.

LA Weight Loss, Inc. n.k.a. Pure Weight Loss, Inc.

Pacific Bell Information Services

Gold’n Plump Poultry, Inc.

Advanced Solutions, Inc.

Further Reading in Employment Law

Other Recent Summaries

Recent Expert Legal Commentaries