Patent Law Updates | New Statutes, Regulations and Rules

January 4, 2012

USPTO Begins Electronic Delivery of Pre-Grant Search Results to the European Patent Office (EPO)

Electronic Delivery of Pre-Grant Search Results to the European Patent Office (EPO)
USPTO No. 11-75, 12/22/2011

USPTO Begins Electronic Delivery of Pre-Grant Search Results to the European Patent Office (EPO)

In October 2011, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) began to electronically deliver search results for all publicly available U.S. patent applications to the European Patent Office (EPO).

This electronic delivery of search results was implemented to assist U.S. applicants who later file in the EPO to comply with an amendment to Rule 141(1) (Information on Prior Art) of the EPO’s implementing regulations to the European Patent Convention (EPC).

“This delivery of search results is consistent with the USPTO’s strategic goal to increase international cooperation and work sharing,” said Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the USPTO David Kappos.

Amended Rule 141(1) EPC, which went into effect on January 1, 2011, applies to all European patent applications filed on or after January 1, 2011.  Amended Rule 141(1) EPC requires applicants to file a copy of the search results from a previous patent application to which the European patent application claims priority.  USPTO’s electronic delivery of prior art citation data from Form PTO-892 (Notice of References Cited) to the EPO relieves applicants of the effort and expense of filing a copy of the search results from a U.S. priority patent application with the EPO.

USPTO will also electronically deliver the search results for an unpublished U.S. patent application where there is consent from an authorized party filed with the USPTO and the U.S. patent application has cleared national security review.

The Form PTO/SB/69 entitled “Certification and Authorization to Permit Access to Search Results by the European Patent Office (EPO)” will be available on the USPTO Web site at http://www.uspto.gov/forms/index.jsp.

There is no fee for the electronic delivery of these search results to the EPO.

Also See:

USPTO to Implement Inventor’s Oath or Declaration Provisions of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act

U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Seeks Public Input on Proposed Fees

USPTO to Test New Post Final Rejection Option

USPTO Expands Patent Law School Clinic Certification Pilot Program

USPTO Launches Small Business Innovation Research Pilot Program

Companies Mentioned

Patent Law

The following companies are mentioned in Patent Law Updates:

Boston Scientific Corp.

Microsoft Corp.

Samsung Electronics America, Inc.

Cordis Corp.

Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc.

U.S. Patent and Trademark Office

Stryker Corp.

Acumed, LLC

Quanta Computer, Inc.

Sanyo North America Corp.

LG Electronics, Inc.

Smith & Nephew, Inc.

Cohesive Technologies, Inc.

Waters Corp.

Swisa, Inc.

Egyptian Goddess, Inc.

Motorola, Inc.

Dror Swisa

Johnson & Johnson, Inc.

Target Corp.

Sears Holding Corp.

Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.

Mayo Collaborative Services d.b.a. Mayo Medical Laboratories

Kohl’s Department Stores, Inc.

K-Mart Corp.

J.C. Penney Company, Inc.

Audiovox Communications Corp.

Glamourmom LLC

McKesson Information Solutions, Inc.

Federated Department Stores

Bridge Medical, Inc.

Elizabeth Lange LLC d.b.a. Liz Lange Maternity

United States Patent and Trademark Office

Smithkline Beecham Corp. (d.b.a. GlaxoSmithKline, plc.)

SmithKline Beecham PLC

HT Window Fashion Corp.

SmithKline Beecham Corp. d.b.a GlaxoSmithKline

Scimed Life Systems Inc.

Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical, Inc.

Glaxo Group Limited d.b.a. GlaxoSmithKline

Mylan Pharmaceutical, Inc.

Ranbaxy, Inc.

Mylan Laboratories, Inc.

Nokia, Inc.

Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.

Stryker Sales Corp.

Stryker Orthopaedics

Howmedica Osteonics Corp.

Teva Pharmaceuticals Industries, Ltd.

Abbot Laboratories

Additional Resources

Patent Law

Further Reading in Patent Law

Other Recent Summaries

Recent Expert Legal Commentaries