Patent Law Updates | New Statutes, Regulations and Rules

May 16, 2011

USPTO Postpones Effective Date of "Track One" Fast-Track Patent Processing

Postponement of "Track One" Fast-Track Patent Processing
No. _______, 4/27/2011

USPTO Postpones Effective Date of "Track One" Fast-Track Patent Processing

The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has postponed the start date of the Track One prioritized patent examination program, which was scheduled to go into effect on May 4, 2011, until further notice due to reduced spending authority in the Full-Year Continuing Appropriations Act, 2011.

“Without the resources to hire a sufficient number of examiners to implement Track One, we must postpone the effective date of the program until we are in a position to implement it successfully while ensuring there will be no adverse impact on non-prioritized examination applications,” said Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the USPTO David Kappos.

Track One, [which is] part of the USPTO’s Three-Track Program, [which would] provide applicants with greater control over when their applications are examined and promote greater efficiency in the patent examination process. Track One would allow inventors and businesses, for a fee, to have their patents processed within 12 months. Additional details on the postponement will be available in a Federal Register notice to be published on April 29, 2011.

The USPTO will announce a new start date for Track One as soon as circumstances permit and will do so via a Federal Register notice.

Also See:

USPTO to Implement Inventor’s Oath or Declaration Provisions of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act

U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Seeks Public Input on Proposed Fees

USPTO to Test New Post Final Rejection Option

USPTO Expands Patent Law School Clinic Certification Pilot Program

USPTO Launches Small Business Innovation Research Pilot Program

Companies Mentioned

Patent Law

The following companies are mentioned in Patent Law Updates:

Boston Scientific Corp.

Microsoft Corp.

Samsung Electronics America, Inc.

Cordis Corp.

Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc.

U.S. Patent and Trademark Office

Stryker Corp.

Acumed, LLC

Quanta Computer, Inc.

Sanyo North America Corp.

LG Electronics, Inc.

Smith & Nephew, Inc.

Cohesive Technologies, Inc.

Waters Corp.

Swisa, Inc.

Egyptian Goddess, Inc.

Motorola, Inc.

Dror Swisa

Johnson & Johnson, Inc.

Target Corp.

Sears Holding Corp.

Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.

Mayo Collaborative Services d.b.a. Mayo Medical Laboratories

Kohl’s Department Stores, Inc.

K-Mart Corp.

J.C. Penney Company, Inc.

Audiovox Communications Corp.

Glamourmom LLC

McKesson Information Solutions, Inc.

Federated Department Stores

Bridge Medical, Inc.

Elizabeth Lange LLC d.b.a. Liz Lange Maternity

United States Patent and Trademark Office

Smithkline Beecham Corp. (d.b.a. GlaxoSmithKline, plc.)

SmithKline Beecham PLC

HT Window Fashion Corp.

SmithKline Beecham Corp. d.b.a GlaxoSmithKline

Scimed Life Systems Inc.

Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical, Inc.

Glaxo Group Limited d.b.a. GlaxoSmithKline

Mylan Pharmaceutical, Inc.

Ranbaxy, Inc.

Mylan Laboratories, Inc.

Nokia, Inc.

Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.

Stryker Sales Corp.

Stryker Orthopaedics

Howmedica Osteonics Corp.

Teva Pharmaceuticals Industries, Ltd.

Abbot Laboratories

Additional Resources

Patent Law

Further Reading in Patent Law

Other Recent Summaries

Recent Expert Legal Commentaries